arXiv puts a quota on submissions as AI-assisted output overwhelms moderation

From October 1, arXiv limits each submitter to two new submissions per calendar month, across all categories, while retaining a ceiling of three active submissions. Rejected papers count because they also consume moderators’ time. Co-authors’ quotas are unaffected when somebody else submits their shared paper; a submission deleted before announcement does not count.

The repository received 40,363 submissions in September, compared with 20,569 two years earlier. Its AI category grew more than sixfold over that period. Volunteer moderators report more thin contributions, studies split into multiple papers and dense AI-generated manuscripts that fail scholarly standards.

The policy does not ban AI-assisted research. arXiv permits disclosed AI use when the work meets its requirements, and describes the quota as a temporary measure while moderation processes improve. The submission increase alone does not measure how much research is worthless.

Analysis: A uniform quota can relieve congestion quickly, but cannot distinguish an excellent third paper from a poor first one. The co-author rule also means large collaborative groups have more submission capacity than isolated researchers. The longer-term challenge is expanding credible evaluation without making access depend primarily on institutional size or the ability to generate polished text.